Quantachrome Corp. v. Micromeritics Instrument Corp.
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GONZALEZ, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE has come before the Court upon the non-jury trial of this matter, and upon Quantachrome’s Motion to Reconsider Court’s Claim 27 Orders, filed March 30, 2000. The Court, having reviewed the record and having considered the evidence and arguments presented at trial, makes the following findings and conclusions.
I. BACKGROUND
Quantachrome and Micromeritics are competing companies engaged in the manufacture of pycnometers. Micromeritics is the holder of United States Patent No. 5,074,146 (the “ ’146 Patent”) and alleges that Quantachrome’s Ultrapycnometer…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States Surgical Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc. And Johnson & Johnson Hospital Services, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Panduit Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- North American Oil Co. v. Star Brite Distributing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
- NEATO, LLC v. Rocky Mountain TradersDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001