Legal Opinion
Panduit Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided January 23, 1987No. Appeal 85-1144PublishedCited by 231 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
On remand from the Supreme Court. Having considered the record, appealed judgment, district court’s findings and application of law, arguments in this court and the Supreme Court, and invited briefs of the parties and amicus American Intellectual Property Law Association, we respond to the remand and again affirm the judgment on the 35 U.S.C. § 102(g) defense and reverse the judgment on the 35 U.S.C. § 103 defense.
The Remand
In remanding, Dennison Manufacturing Co. v. Panduit Corp., — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 1578, 89 L.Ed.2d 817, 229 USPQ 478 (1986), vacating, 774 F.2d 1082, 227…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by231 opinions
- Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- C.R. Bard, Inc. v. M3 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
226 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.