Legal Opinion

Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 30, 1990No. 90-1016, 90-1017PublishedCited by 253 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Circuit Judge.

Bausch & Lomb Incorporated (B & L) appeals from the September 13, 1989 Judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, holding U.S. Pat. No. 4,384,298 (LaBarre) valid and infringed by B & L. Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Bausch & Lomb Inc., 722 F.Supp. 595, 13 USPQ2d 1105 (N.D.Cal. 1989). Hewlett-Packard Company (HP) cross-appeals from that portion of the Judgment holding that B & L had not actively induced infringement of the LaBarre patent subsequent to September of 1985. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Two patents are discussed extensively throughout…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Panduit Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. Henry v. A. B. Dick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Demaco Corporation v. F. Von Langsdorff Licensing Limited and F. Von Langsdorff Bauverfahren GmbhCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by253 opinions

  1. Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. Dsu Medical Corporation v. Jms Co., LtdCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. And Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (Doing Business as Labcorp)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  4. Nalco Company v. Chem-Mod, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  5. Cross Medical Products, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

248 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API