Hoover v. Frickanisce
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Gunther, J.,
William F. Hoover and Jessie Hoover, appellees, filed their bill in equity against Frank Frickanisce. and Josephine Frickanisce,- appellants, adjoining landowners, to compel removal of an automobile which appellants had placed in a private road or driveway, thereby-’ obstructing the passageway. An answer wás filed and'after hearing the chancellor concluded' that an easement appurtenant by implied reservation . existed in favor of appellees’ tract, and entered a decree. nisi granting the relief prayed for. Appellants’ exceptions were dismissed and a final decree entered.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Heffley v. LohrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Philadelphia Steel Abrasive Co. v. Louis J. Gedicke SonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Vinso v. Mingo Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Andreas v. SteigerwaltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Baslego v. Kruleskie Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Taylor v. GrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Lerner v. PoulosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Edmondson v. DolinichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- McAndrews v. SPENCER Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Cannon Brothers, Inc. v. D'AgostinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.