Legal Opinion

Baslego v. Kruleskie Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1947No. Appeal, 72PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Fine, J.,

Amelia Baslego, appellee, filed her bill in equity ágainst Michael Kruleskie and Mary Kruleskie, appellants, adjoining land owners, to compel removal of a wire fence obstructing a gateway, front steps, areaway and passageway between the two tracts. An answer was filed and after hearing the chancellor concluded that an easement appurtenant by implied reservation existed in favor of appellée’s tract and entered a decree nisi granting the relief prayed for. Appellants’ exceptions were dismissed, a final decree entered, and this appeal followed.

Sylvester Baslego, deceased…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Tide Water Pipe Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Lauderbach-Zerby Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Becker v. RittenhouseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Grace Methodist Episcopal Church v. DobbinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lehner v. MONTGOMERYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Liddy v. LamoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. DePIETRO v. TRIANOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Spaeder v. TabakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Hoover v. FrickanisceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API