Edmondson v. Dolinich
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This appeal is from a judgment granting possession of a fifteen foot wide alley to appellees. The lower court held that appellees had acquired title to the alley by adverse possession. We have concluded, however, that appellees proved only sporadic and non-exclusive use of the alley. We therefore reverse.
Prior to this action both appellants and appellees acquired an easement over the alley by virtue of its description in their deeds. See Hoover v. Frickanisce, 169 Pa.Super. 443, 82 A.2d 570 (1951). On July 12, 1979, however, appellees filed a declaration of adverse possession in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conneaut Lake Park, Inc. v. KlingensmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Parks v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Piper v. MowrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Girard Trust Bank v. SweeneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Girard Trust Corn Exchange Bank v. Brink's, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Flannery v. StumpSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Recreation Land Corp. v. HartzfeldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Showalter v. PantaleoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Klos v. MolendaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Bezjak, J. v. Diamond, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.