Legal Opinion

Vinso v. Mingo Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1947No. Appeal, 20PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

Defendants appeal from a decree in equity, inter alia, restraining defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs’ use of an easement over land in front of defendants’ premises.

Plaintiffs and defendants owned adjoining lots upon which each had a residence and outbuildings.. The southern end of these lots fronted on what would be an extension of Jefferson Street, which was open only to the eastern line of defendants’ property.

One Vincent Chanko became the owner, of both lots under a deed from Andrew Kachmarski, in which the land was described as “Beginning at a point in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Carroll v. AsburySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  2. Andreas v. SteigerwaltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Maier v. Walborn HighSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Ulrich v. Wm. S. and Alice GrimesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Holmes v. LongwillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bieber v. ZellnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Potis v. CoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Taylor v. GrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Justin J. Powell, Inc. v. WianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. McAndrews v. SPENCER Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API