Andreas v. Steigerwalt
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 248, Oct. T., 1903, by plaintiff, -from decree of C. P. Schuylkill Go., May T., 1903, No. 2, oil bill in equity in case of Adam Andreas v. A. H. Steigerwalt. Bill in equity for an injunction. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was the decree enjoining the defendant from interfering with the alley, or with the free and uninterrupted use thereof.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rice, P. J.,
The plaintiffs, Alfred II. Steigerwalt, David H. Kistler and Stephen Steigerwalt, are the owners in severalty of three contiguous lots fronting on the east side of a public highway, running nearly north and south, known as the Summit Hill road. This road is intersected by another, running east and west, known as the Tamaqua road. The land lying to the north of the lots and between them and the Tamaqua road, as well as that lying to the east and south of them, belongs to the defendant. The three lots are of the same depth. The northernmost lot was conveyed by the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Fox v. Union Sugar RefineryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Appeal of FergusonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Paul v. CarverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
- Manbeck v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Richmond v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bieber v. ZellnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Taylor v. GrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Vinso v. Mingo Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- McAndrews v. SPENCER Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Hoover v. FrickanisceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.