Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Breiner
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided January 11, 1999No. 21708PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
The Disciplinary Board has filed a report, pursuant to Rule 2.7(d) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii (RSCH). The report, based upon a stipulation of facts and rules violations between the respondent Myles S. Breiner and the petitioner Office of Disciplinary Counsel, recommends that Breiner be suspended from the practice of law for a period of sixty (60) days.
We accept the stipulation of facts and rules violations. For the reasons set forth below, however, we suspend Breiner from the practice of law for a period of six (6) months. A separate suspension order is entered…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- In the Matter of David DellingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- State v. FukusakuHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Cooper v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- In Re DalySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Grievance Administrator v. LopatinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Young v. Allstate Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Matsuura v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2003
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
- Disciplinary Counsel v. LoDicoOhio Supreme Court · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.