Legal Opinion
Bush v. Lane
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 11, 1958No. Civ. 9315PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARNE, J. pro tem. *
The cross-defendants, Bush, appeal from a judgment in the sum of $2,218.01 entered in favor of the Lanes on their cross-complaint for the reasonable value of certain storage charges. A motion for a new trial was denied.
The cross-complaint alleged that appellants became indebted to Leonard Nix in the sum of $2,218.01 for storage furnished by Nix at appellants’ request and in consideration of their promise to pay therefor; that no part of said sum had been paid; and that Nix had assigned said storage charge to the respondents.
Appellants contend that the evidence is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jennings v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Medina v. Van Camp Sea Food Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- Young v. BruereCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Dunham, Carrigan & Hayden Co. v. Thermoid Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Bush v. LaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gray v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Keene v. KeeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Meredith v. MarksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Penn Security Life Insurance v. RisingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.