Bush v. Lane
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PEEK, J
By their second amended complaint plaintiffs sought to recover from defendants the value of goods sold and delivered to defendants. Following a hearing before the court sitting without a jury, judgment was entered in •favor of defendants. ' Plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial was denied, and they now appeal. It is our conclusion that the judgment and order must be sustained.
The record shows that defendants, by a contract of sale, sold to plaintiffs certain real property known as Lane’s Riverdale Resort. As a part of the transaction, plaintiffs executed a quitclaim deed to defendants…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Zaslow v. KroenertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fox v. American Propane, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Bush v. LaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Oge v. Resolute Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Kertz v. ParisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Lyon v. Western Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.