Legal Opinion

Bush v. Lane

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1956No. Civ. 8638PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEEK, J

By their second amended complaint plaintiffs sought to recover from defendants the value of goods sold and delivered to defendants. Following a hearing before the court sitting without a jury, judgment was entered in •favor of defendants. ' Plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial was denied, and they now appeal. It is our conclusion that the judgment and order must be sustained.

The record shows that defendants, by a contract of sale, sold to plaintiffs certain real property known as Lane’s Riverdale Resort. As a part of the transaction, plaintiffs executed a quitclaim deed to defendants…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zaslow v. KroenertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fox v. American Propane, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Bush v. LaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Oge v. Resolute Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Kertz v. ParisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Lyon v. Western Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API