Legal Opinion
Medina v. Van Camp Sea Food Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 31, 1946No. Civ. 3384PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment against defendants for the reasonable value of the services of plaintiffs in transporting fish and shark livers, belonging to defendants, from the Canal Zone to San Diego. The recoveries against the various groups of defendants total $5,857.61.
The facts are not in dispute. Plaintiffs were owners of the tuna boat Queen Mary. Van Camp Sea Food Company, Inc., Wm. A. Magellan and others were owners of the Anna M. Mariano and Sam Crivello were owners of the Europa. Guy H. Silva was the owner of the Emma R. S. Salvadore Carlos and others were the owners of the Sao…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Silva v. Providence Hospital of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Jennings v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Gray v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Div. of Labor Law Enf't v. Transpacific Transp. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Keene v. KeeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- C. F. Bolster Co. v. J. C. Boespflug Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.