Legal Opinion

In Re Key

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 13, 1986No. 19-11623PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Chief Judge:

The question for decision in the case before us is whether we should grant a creditor’s motion to dismiss a debtor’s chapter 13 case on the basis of 11 U.S.C. § 109(f) of the Bankruptcy Code (“the Code”). Due to the lack of proof, we will deny the creditor’s motion to dismiss.

As best we can determine from the limited record before us, we summarize the facts of this case as follows: 1 The debtor filed a petition for the repayment of her debts under chapter 13. A creditor, the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Federal”), filed the instant motion to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. In Re AughenbaughCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re HerreraUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  2. In Re Nicolet, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. In Re KeulUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Kehm v. Citicorp Homeowners Service, Inc. (In Re Kehm)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. In Re PaolinoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API