Legal Opinion

Kehm v. Citicorp Homeowners Service, Inc. (In Re Kehm)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 30, 1988No. 08-16009PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMAS M. TWARDOWSKI, Bankruptcy Judge.

Four interrelated matters are presently before this court on motions and a complaint involving debtors Leroy H. and Christine E. Kehm (“debtors”) and creditor Citicorp Homeowners Service (“Citicorp”) 1 :(1) Debtors’ 11 U.S.C. § 506(a) complaint to determine the extent of Citicorp’s secured status in property utilized as debtors’ principal residence (“property”);(2) Citicorp’s 11 U.S.C. § 362 motion seeking relief from the automatic stay;(3) Debtors’ motion for a moratorium on payments;(4) The confirmation of debtors’ amended plan…

2Cases cited63 opinions

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RRSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
In the Matter of Benny L. ROACH and Edith Roach, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
In Re AughenbaughCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
In Re SimpkinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

In Re Estel Ray Hougland, Ruth Evelyn Hougland, Debtors. Estel Ray Hougland Ruth Evelyn Hougland v. The Lomas & Nettleton Company, Creditor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
Wolk v. Goldome Realty Credit Corp. (In Re 222 Liberty Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
In Re RossUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1989
Matter of KaczmarczykUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · 1989
Soliman v. Spencer (In Re Spencer)District Court, D. Delaware · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.