Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Great Northern Railway Co. v. District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1949No. Nos. 34,689, 34,690, 34,693, 34,694PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Magnet, Justice.

On January 10, 1948, the district court of the sixteenth judicial district, after a final hearing on the engineer’s and viewers’ reports, ordered the establishment of judicial ditch No. 12 in Grant, Traverse, and Wilkin counties. The order is brought here for review both by certiorari and appeal. Since it is properly here, by one method or the other, it is unnecessary to determine whether the correct procedure was adopted.

The Great Northern Railway Company and the Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railroad Company, the latter hereinafter referred to as the Soo Line,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Utick v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Barber v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Lupkes v. Town of CliftonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Leland v. HeibergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. State ex rel. Pederson v. WattsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Judicial Ditch No. 12Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. Agra Resources Coop v. Freeborn County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  3. Pestka v. County of Blue EarthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API