Legal Opinion

Fidelity National Title Insurance v. Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 26, 1989No. D008990PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KREMER, P. J.—Plaintiff

Fidelity National Title Insurance Company appeals summary judgment favoring defendant Clayton L. Miller on its complaint for breach of warranty and common counts. We reverse the summary judgment because the record discloses numerous triable factual issues.

I

Facts

In reviewing the propriety of summary judgment, we must accept the evidence and inferences most favorable to Fidelity. (Hepp v. Lockheed-California Co. (1978) 86 Cal.App.3d 714, 717-718 [150 Cal.Rptr. 408].) Applying that standard, the evidence shows: Miller owned Coronado property. In 1953 Miller…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Conn v. National Can CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Hepp v. Lockheed-California Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Lawrence v. Chicago Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. In Re Marriage of ShoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Recorded Picture Co. [Prods.] Ltd. v. Nelson Entm't, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Siegel v. Fidelity National Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Southland Title Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Thorstrom v. ThorstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Herbert A. Crocker & Co. v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API