Legal Opinion

Gladstone v. Hillel

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 15, 1988No. A036056PublishedCited by 17 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NEWSOM, J.

This appeal arises from a judgment secured by Mark Gladstone (hereafter Gladstone) against David Hillel, Mark Nhaissi, Master Diamond and Gem Trading, Inc., Master Diamond of California, Master Diamond, and Master Diamond Wholesale, Inc. (hereafter appellants). Gladstone brought the action against appellants, seeking equitable relief to recover possession of personal property and claiming damages on theories of conversion and fraud. After the parties waived jury trial, the case was tried before the Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco. The court awarded…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Darrell Taylor, D/B/A Darrell Taylor Topographic Charts v. Joseph B. Meirick, D/B/A Lakes IllustratedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Frank Oddo v. Jack W. Ries, Mme Publications, Mme Publishing Company and Material Movement EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Herbert Rosenthal Jewelry Corp. v. Edward and Lucy Kalpakian, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bihun v. AT & T Information Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Schuldies v. MillarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Balboa Insurance v. Trans Global EquitiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Harwood State Bank v. CharonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Broadwater v. Old Republic SuretyUtah Supreme Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API