Legal Opinion

United States v. Nozaki Bros.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 18, 1914No. 1277PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 33927 (T. D. 33816)

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

This appeal brings up for review a decision of the Board of General Appraisers sustaining a protest alleging clerical error. While the protest does not allege “manifest” clerical error, which is the only clerical error for which relief can be granted under the statute, we assume for the purposes of the consideration of the case the sufficiency of the protest.

The importation-was of basket materials of willow imported from Kobo, Japan, and invoiced and destined to St. Louis, Mo. It appears that the several items of the invoice are clearly and correctly set forth. There appears thereupon an item…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. WymanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. Thomsen & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. De Liagre v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. Kridel, Sons & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  3. United States v. RiceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. Balbach Smelting & Refining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  5. Consmiller v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API