Kridel, Sons & Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 8066 (T. D. 37209), [Oral argument Deo. 5,1917, by Mr. Duffy and Mr. Hanson.]
1Opinion of the CourtMartiN, Judge
The protest in this case relates to six several entries of velvet ribbons which were imported in November and December, 1915. The numbers and dates of the entries in their order are as follows: 70732, November 15; 75312, November 24; 82648/1, December 4-; 85623, December 9; 91596, December 21; 96770, December 30.
In each instance the merchandise was assessed with appropriate ad valorem duty and also with so-called “additional duty” under paragraph 1 of section 3, tariff act of 1913, upon the alleged ground that the appraised' value of the several importations exceeded the entered value thereof.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Swedish Produce Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- United States v. Spingarn Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- United States v. DowningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- United States v. Nozaki Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- United States v. Philips Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Balbach Smelting & Refining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- Consmiller v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
- Harold J. Ritter Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
- Mottola v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958