Legal Opinion

United States v. Rice

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 18, 1914No. 1278PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 33927 (T. D. 33816).

1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge

This appeal involves a question of claimed manifest clerical error The goods were manufactured at Darvel, Scotland, and exported from Glasgow, Scotland, to Boston, Mass.

Upon the invoice is an item entitled "carriage to port paid by shipper amounting to 6s. 8d., and is included in the price of the *289goods. These goods were manufactured by us at Darvel.” On entry this item was not deducted. The goods were appraised as entered. If this item of carriage is included within the dutiable value of the goods entered and appraised at 3£ pence per yard, these goods are properly dutiable at 2J cents and 2…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. William J. McLean v. James L. MeekSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. Robertson v. BradburySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. United States v. Nozaki Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mottola v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. De Liagre v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. United States v. GordonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API