Legal Opinion

De Liagre v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 6, 1915No. 1577PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 37796.

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

It is conceded in the |>resent case that the merchandise was correctly classified'by the collector, and was assessed with appropriate ad valorem duty under the tariff act of 1913. It is also conceded that the value upon which the ad valorem rate of duty was assessed was the dutiable valuation of the merchandise as declared by the importers in their entry. Nevertheless, the importers claim relief against the assessment upon the ground that the valuation in question was excessive, and that this fact or condition arose from a manifest clerical error which appeared in the consular invoice upon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Nozaki Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  2. United States v. RiceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Import Export Service v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. Kridel, Sons & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  3. Kurz & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. Balbach Smelting & Refining Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API