Legal Opinion

Consmiller v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 10, 1920No. 2026PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers; Abstract 43523. [Oral argument Apr. 6,1920, by Mr. Brooks, jr., and Mr. Hanson.]

1Opinion of the Court

Barber, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

Paragraph I of Section III of tbe act of 1913 among other things provides in substance that tbe owner, etc., of imported merchandise at the time be makes entry thereof, but not after either tbe invoice or tbe merchandise has come under tbe observation of tbe appraiser, may make sucb additions in tbe entry to or deductions from tbe cost or value given in tbe invoice as in bis opinion may raise or lower tbe same to tbe actual market value or wholesale price of the merchandise at tbe time of exportation to tbe United States; tbat additional duties…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Swedish Produce Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. United States v. Proctor CoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. United States v. Nozaki Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. Thomsen & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  5. Kridel, Sons & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kurz & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. RiversCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API