Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Chiropractic League v. Steele

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1935No. Civ. 9545PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DO CLING, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment enjoining appellants, all of whom are licensed chiropractors under section 7, Statutes of 1923, page lxxxvii (the Chiropractic Act), from practicing or attempting to practice or advertising or holding themselves out as practicing certain designated modes of treating the sick and afflicted. It was claimed by the plaintiff that a license to practice under the Chiropractic Act did not authorize the use by the licentiate of any of the modes of treatment enumerated in the judgment, and that consequently the practice of such modes by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kentucky State Board of Dental Examiners v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  2. People v. SeccombeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Board of Medical Examiners of Utah v. BlairUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Dean v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  5. In Re WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Gallo v. AcunaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. People v. LimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Chalmers-Francis v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Stegner v. Bahr & Ledoyen, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API