Legal Opinion

Chalmers-Francis v. Nelson

California Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1936No. L. A. 15162PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

Two practicing physicians and surgeons, on behalf of themselves and all other doctors, brought this injunction proceeding to restrain the defendant Nelson, a licensed and registered nurse employed by the defendant hospital, from administering general anesthetics in connection with operations. Such practice by the defendant is asserted to constitute the illegal practice of medicine, in violation of the Medical Practice Act. Judgment went for the defendants, and plaintiffs have appealed.

Appellants’ arguments are directed to the proposition that defendants are illegally practicing medicine.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Armstrong v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Underwood v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  4. Frank v. SouthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. People Ex Rel. Chiropractic League v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Vinod C. Bhan, C.R.N.A. v. Nme Hospitals, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Dba Manteca HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Magit v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Drennan v. Community Health Investment Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
  4. Cooper v. State Bd. of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. State v. CatellierWyoming Supreme Court · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API