Legal Opinion
Stegner v. Bahr & Ledoyen, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 24, 1954No. Civ. 15830PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
Plaintiffs brought this action against the owners and lessors and the lessees and operators of a certain rock quarry, to enjoin further operation of the quarry and to obtain declaratory relief.
It appears that on July 2, 1951, the board of supervisors of the county adopted, as an immediately effective urgency measure, an ordinance which in a certain zone required a permit for the erection of any building or structure designed for any use other than a single family dwelling or for the establishment of any multiple family, auto court, commercial or industrial business or use.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Wilkins v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Wheeler v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- McCarthy v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- South Santa Clara Valley Water Conservation District v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Wade v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Major v. SilnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Robie v. LillisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.