Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Seccombe

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1930No. Docket No. 6273PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNELL, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal following an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend.

The purpose of the action was to obtain an injunction restraining the defendant from continuing to pursue the occupation of usurer. The complaint contains the following allegations: That the city attorney and city prosecutor of the city of Los Angeles bring the action as such on behalf of the People of the state of California; that the defendant has on two separate occasions been convicted of the misdemeanor of “demanding and receiving usury”;…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. Gold Run Ditch & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Pierce v. Stablemen's Local 8760California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. People v. Monterey Fish Products Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  4. People v. Truckee Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  5. State v. EhrlickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Gallo v. AcunaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. People v. LimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. People v. BrophyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Monterey Club v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API