Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Winston-Salem

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 26, 1973No. 76PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

The plaintiffs’ claim is based on a negligent failure of the city properly to inspect, to discover and remove defects, and to keep in good repair its sewer line along Milton Drive. The evidence indicated the city’s street maintenance crew had caused sand and gravel to accumulate at the point of joinder between the city’s main sewer line and the plaintiffs’ branch line thus causing the back-up and overflow into the plaintiffs’ home. The plaintiffs introduced ample evidence of the resulting damage.

After hearing the evidence, the trial court properly concluded the plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pender v. City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Dayton v. . AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Carter Ex Rel. Clap v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Webster v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Foster v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miller v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Cauble v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Jenkins v. City of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Redmond v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Johnson v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API