Legal Opinion

Dayton v. . Asheville

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 21, 1923PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action to recover compensation for the partial taking or injury to plaintiffs' lands, located within the corporate limits of the city of Asheville.

From a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiffs, the defendant appealed, assigning errors. This action was instituted on 6 May, 1921, by T. J. Dayton and wife against the city of Asheville to recover damages or compensation for the partial taking or injury to two houses and lots, located in said city, the alleged injury or damage resulting, according to the plaintiff's contention, from the construction, maintenance and operation by the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Platt Bros. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
  2. McKinney v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Lloyd v. Albemarle & Raleigh R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Hocutt v. Wilmington & Weldon R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  5. James Ex Rel. James v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Long v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. McKinney v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. City of Raleigh v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Carter Ex Rel. Clap v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API