Miller v. City of Charlotte
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
The sole question presented by this appeal is: Did the trial court err in dismissing plaintiff’s action on the ground that plaintiff filed notice of claim with the city manager rather than the city council, as required by the Charlotte City Charter? The Court of Appeals held not. We disagree.
The general rule in North Carolina on municipal tort notice requirements is stated in Carter v. Greensboro, 249 N.C. 328, 106 S.E. 2d 564 (1959), as follows: “Ordinarily, the giving of timely notice is a condition precedent to the right to maintain an action, and nonsuit is proper unless…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Galbreath v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1970
- Vermeer Ex Rel. Vermeer v. SnellerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Meredith v. City of MelvindaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- Dennis v. City of AlbemarleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Pender v. City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Waller v. ButkovichDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1984
- Erickson v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Mount v. City of VermillionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Plemmons Ex Rel. Teeter v. City of GastoniaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Jenkins v. City of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.