Legal Opinion

Cauble v. City of Asheville

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 19, 1980No. 7928SC17PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Defendant first raises the question whether plaintiff has standing to bring this action, contending that notice of claim was not given as required by the Code of the City of Asheville. Section 11 of the Code of the City of Asheville provides:

No action shall be instituted or maintained against the city upon any claim of demand whatsoever of any kind or character, until the claimant shall have first presented his or her claim or demand, in writing, to said council, and said council shall have declined to pay or settle the same as presented, or for ten days after such…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tridyn Industries, Inc. v. American Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Board of Education v. Town of HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. Graham v. . CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Graham v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. School Directors v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cauble v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Shavitz v. City of High PointCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Cauble v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API