Legal Opinion

Redmond v. City of Asheville

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1974No. 7428SC693PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Plaintiffs contend that their letter to the City Manager should be adjudged substantial compliance with the charter requirement that the claim be presented to the City Council. The Supreme Court of North Carolina has decided otherwise. “The statute and the decided cases do not permit the court to repeal the plain wording of the requirement that notice in writing be given to the named officials . . . Relaxation of the rules is within the jurisdiction of the agency that makes them- — that is the General Assembly.” Johnson v. City of Winston-Salem, 282 N.C. 518, 523, 193 S.E. 2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nevins v. City of LexingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Johnson v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. City of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Miller v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API