Legal Opinion
City of Coleman v. Rhone
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 17, 1949No. 2723PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLLINGS, Justice.
This suit was brought by George D. ' Rhone and others, appellees, against the City of Coleman, appellant, to set aside .and cancel as unreasonable, arbitrary and void a city ordinance, the material substance of which is as follows :
“An ordinance regulating traffic upon the public streets of the City of Coleman and designating a portion of North Concho Street as a fire lane * * *
“Article 1. North'Concho Street, begin-ing 35 feet south of intersection of North Concho Street and Cottonwood, and extending to the intersection of North Con-cho Street and Live Oak Street is hereby…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Trapp v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- Shupee v. Railroad CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1934
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi v. Texas Department of Licensing and RegulationTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Trinity River Authority v. URS Consultants, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. RichardsTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- John Ed Price v. City of Junction, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- City of Bellaire v. LamkinTexas Supreme Court · 1958
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.