Legal Opinion

Trinity River Authority v. URS Consultants, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1994No. D-4376PublishedCited by 209 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhillips, Chief Justice

joined by GONZALEZ, HIGHTOWER, HECHT, CORNYN, GAMMAGE, ENOCH and SPECTOR, Justices.

Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 16.008 bars suits against architects or engineers for defective design of an improvement to real property unless brought within ten years after the improvement is completed, regardless of when the defect is discovered. The issue presented is whether this statute of repose violates either the Texas or United States Constitution. We hold that, as applied in this case, it does not, and therefore we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. 869 S.W.2d 367.

I

In May…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Johnson v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Willis v. MaverickTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Murray v. San Jacinto Agency, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by209 opinions

  1. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. S.V. v. R.V.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. City of Tyler v. LikesTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998

204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API