City of Bellaire v. Lamkin
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Griffin
The petitioner, City of Bellaire, Texas, hereinafter called City is a Home Rule city and under the authority of Articles 1011, 1011a, et seq., Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes, it duly and legally passed a comprehensive zoning ordinance on April 19,1950. As. far as is material in our cause, this ordinance defined a front yard as “the open space between a building and the street on which it fronts.” Further, the ordinance provided that “no fence, wall or anything similar shall be permitted in the front yard.” Section 24, Subsection 7 of the said ordinance provides that “no wall, fence, or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lombardo v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- City of Waxahachie v. WatkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- King v. GuerraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- City of San Antonio v. Pigeonhole Parking of Texas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- City of Fort Worth v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1964
- City of College Station v. Turtle Rock Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- City of University Park v. BennersTexas Supreme Court · 1972
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.