Legal Opinion

Gauthier v. Gosselin

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 2, 1947No. 3698PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, J.

This case presents the issue whether the verdict or findings of a jury, in a probate appeal involving the validity of a will, are advisory to or binding upon the Trial Court. Since there is no constitutional right to a jury trial in a probate appeal (James v. Staples, 87 N. H. 49: 2 Page, Wills (3d ed.), ss. 643, 644), the issue is solely one of legislative intent. Consequently eases in other juris-' dictions are of little weight and the relative merits of either view calls for a legislative rather than a judicial judgment. See, Fed. R. Civ. P., Rule 39; Model Probate Code (1946) s. 18 (b)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Perkins v. New Hampshire Power Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
  2. State v. Wilton RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  3. Lemire v. HaleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1944
  4. James v. StaplesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re AtkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. Sylvain v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  3. Hackett v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API