Gauthier v. Gosselin
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKenison, J.
This case presents the issue whether the verdict or findings of a jury, in a probate appeal involving the validity of a will, are advisory to or binding upon the Trial Court. Since there is no constitutional right to a jury trial in a probate appeal (James v. Staples, 87 N. H. 49: 2 Page, Wills (3d ed.), ss. 643, 644), the issue is solely one of legislative intent. Consequently eases in other juris-' dictions are of little weight and the relative merits of either view calls for a legislative rather than a judicial judgment. See, Fed. R. Civ. P., Rule 39; Model Probate Code (1946) s. 18 (b)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Perkins v. New Hampshire Power Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
- State v. Wilton RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
- Lemire v. HaleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1944
- James v. StaplesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re AtkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Sylvain v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- Hackett v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948