Legal Opinion

Hackett v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 3, 1948No. 3701PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, J.

As stated by the defendants, “the fundamental issue is whether or not the petitioners, as former minority stockholders in the Concord and Portsmouth Railroad, are entitled on their petition to an appraisal of their stock under R. L., c. 296, s. 25, et seq." While the statute provides that “the corporation . . . may apply by petition,” it has been construed as also allowing the dissenting stockholder the same privilege. “A stockholder in a railroad thus dissenting may by petition to the Superior Court seek a determination of the value of his ‘stock, interest or property right taken’ P. L., c.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edes v. BoardmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
  2. Walker v. WalkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885
  3. Lewellyn v. FollansbeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
  4. Perkins v. New Hampshire Power Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
  5. Conn v. Manchester Amusement Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Berlinguette v. StantonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API