Legal Opinion

State v. Wilton Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 1, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.

It was held in Thompson v. Railroad, 86 N. H. 204, that if a railroad’s cessation or curtailment of service is unreasonable, the public service commission has power to order restoration to the extent necessary to establish reasonable service. Since here complete discontinuance of passenger service is reasonable, the questions are limited to the defendants’ obligation to furnish any passenger service, and, if the obligation exists, whether the service now furnished is a compliance with it.

The defendants would have the Wilton charter construed as not requiring any service unless there is a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. StollSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Bridgeport Traction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1895

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re GambleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Commissioner of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1946
  3. Vaillancourt v. Concord General Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Juvenile Case 1089Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  5. Ettinger v. Town of Madison Planning BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API