Legal Opinion

Perkins v. New Hampshire Power Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 5, 1940No. 3112PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.

The legislature has authorized the transfer of the “franchise, works or system” of a public utility to another one, provided the Public Service Commission “shall find that it will be for the public good and shall make an order assenting thereto.” A dissenting stockholder of the transferor is to have his rights “regulated, protected and determined” by the statutes relating to the rights of a dissenting stockholder in a railroad corporation which leases its road to another corporation or unites with it to form a new one. P. L., c. 240, ss. 28, 30. A stockholder in a railroad thus dissenting may…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rockingham County Light Power Co. v. Hobbs.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904
  2. Dow v. Northern RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1886
  3. Goodrich Falls Electric Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
  4. Gregg v. Northern RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1893

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Appeal of Concerned Corporators of the Portsmouth Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  2. Ingersoll v. WilliamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. Coburn v. First Equity Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  4. In Re City Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  5. Gauthier v. GosselinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API