Legal Opinion

Lemire v. Haley

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 26, 1944No. 3474PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, C. J.

As a general rule, questions of law once decided in a particular case will not be re-examined upon a subsequent transfer. Vallee v. Company, 89 N. H. 558; Watkins v. Railroad, 84 N. H. 124, 126; Robertson v. Monroe, 80 N. H. 258, 264; Whittemore v. Railroad, 77 N. H. 61, 62; Kidd v. Company, 75 N. H. 154, 158, and cases cited. This rule applies to many of the questions presented by the present record.

The defendant requested the Court to instruct the jury that the value of the services which the plaintiff rendered the decedent was not to be determined by the benefit which the decedent derived…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Faber v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Downey v. Union Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Randolph v. CastleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Suojanen v. TardifSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  2. Blanchard v. CalderwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  3. Taylor v. NuttingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  4. Welch v. ColemanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
  5. Gauthier v. GosselinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API