Legal Opinion

United States v. Morton

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided April 1, 1983No. ACM S25570PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION UPON FURTHER REVIEW

MILLER, Judge:

Upon our initial review of this case, United States v. Morton, 14 M.J. 627 (A.F.C.M. R.1982), we returned it to the approving authority because trial defense counsel had not been provided an opportunity to examine and comment on new matters contained in an Addendum to the Review of the Staff Judge Advocate.

The record now contains both trial defense counsel’s comments upon these new matters and an action by the approving authority, executed by him following receipt of trial defense counsel’s additional comments. Accordingly, since, the addi*852tional…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Barnes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  4. Graves v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. United States v. PaleniusUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. KomorousU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. MenaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API