United States v. Mena
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
MITCHELL, Senior Judge:
Appellant was convicted at a contested bench special court-martial of one count of cocaine use. The case is before this court in the normal course of review. At issue is whether the military judge conducted an adequate inquiry regarding a stipulation of fact used at trial. We hold that the stipulation was confessional and that its proffer should have triggered a more detailed inquiry by the military judge. Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 811(c); United States v. Bertelson, 3 M.J. 314 (C.M.A.1977).
In a pretrial agreement, appellant bargained for a sentence limitation in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Turner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. HarperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. ManceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.