Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Komorous

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided November 22, 1991No. ACM S28514PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*909OPINION OP THE COURT

JAMES, Judge:

Appellant was convicted of theft of long-distance telephone services.1 He now assigns as error that the staff judge advocate did not serve upon him an addendum to the post-trial recommendations to the convening authority. We agree with appellant: the addendum contained new matters, and it should have been served. This error and another that we discuss below require us to set aside the convening authority’s action as premature.

I. Post-Trial Procedure

The results of a court-martial are examined by the commander who convened the court-martial, and that commander…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. United States v. HillUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  2. United States v. CraigUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. DeGroccoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. NarineUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. SpurlinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. CrawfordU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  2. United States v. ThompsonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  3. United States v. BostU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. CookUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
  5. United States v. DenierUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API