Legal Opinion

Craley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 2006No. 162 MAP 2004PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

We granted allowance of appeal in this matter to address the interplay between coverage exclusions in motor vehicle insurance policies, including the household vehicle exclusion previously found enforceable by this Court,1 and the statutory provision of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL) providing “named insureds” 2 the ability to waive *488“stacked” uninsured motorist coverage, 75 Pa.C.S. § 1738, which the Superior Court has found inapplicable to inter-policy stacking, the stacking of benefits provided by two or more policies.3 After review of the relevant…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Buffalo Township v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Eichelman v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Burstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. DicksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. MatthewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. In Re Milton Hershey SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Generette v. Donegal Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API