Legal Opinion

Reinforced Earth Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 6, 2002No. 124 MAP 2000PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

Justice CAPPY.

In this appeal of The Reinforced Earth Company and its insurer, the State Workers’ Insurance Fund (collectively, “Reinforced Earth”) we consider (1) whether the Commonwealth Court erred in holding that public policy does not exclude the appellee, Juan Carlos S. Astudillo (“Claimant”), an unauthorized alien, from receiving relief under the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act1; and (2) assuming Claimant’s eligibility to receive benefits in the first instance, whether the Commonwealth Court’s decision that Reinforced Earth failed to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Shick v. ShireySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Mamlin v. GenoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Dillon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Vista International Hotel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Daniels)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Hannaberry HVAC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Design Kitchen and Baths v. LagosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Commonwealth v. McHughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Jimoh v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API