Deardorff v. Foresman
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtRay, J.
Action by the appellee, upon a promissory note, against Deeds, Deardorff & Lehman. Deeds suffered a default. The other defendants answered in two paragraphs. First, that at the date of the note in suit, Deeds, who was insolvent, applied to them to execute the note with him, as his sureties, to the plaintiff, which they refused to do; that he fraudulently represented to them that if they would sign the note, he could procure as co-sureties with them eleven other responsible men, who are named, and that he would not deliver the note to the plaintiff until such signatures were procured. That he…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pawling and Others v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1808
- Putnam v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
- United States v. LefflerSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Greenvault v. President of the Farmers & Mechanics' BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1847
- Bibb v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State ex rel. McCarty v. PepperIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
- Newlin v. BeardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1873
- Smith v. Board of SupervisorsIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
- Edwards v. City Nat. Bank of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Helms v. Wayne Agricultural Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1881
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.