Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marcia O'COnnOr v. Combined Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 14, 2011No. 09-2399Unpublished

1DissentHelene N. White, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. In concluding that the district court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of Combined Insurance because no valid contract ever existed between Combined Insurance and Prybyla, the majority focuses on the fact that Prybyla never applied for any of the insurance policies, either personally or through an authorized agent. However, the essential elements of a contract were otherwise present. All parties had the capacity to enter into contracts. The terms of the insurance policy offered by Combined Insurance were accepted, the consideration was paid, and a policy was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. WarnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Bank of Detroit v. Standard Accident InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Camp v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Henson v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Leslie v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API