Legal Opinion
Yakima Indian Nation v. Whiteside
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided September 11, 1985No. C-83-604 JLQPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
QUACKENBUSH, District Judge.
The Yakima Indian Nation (Yakima Nation) brought this suit seeking a declarato ry judgment and injunction barring the defendants from taking or permitting any land use within the “Closed Area” which is contrary to the Amended Zoning Regulations of the Yakima Nation (Yakima Nation Code). The named defendants are the Yakima County Commissioners, the Director of Yakima County Planning Department, and Philip Brendale, record owner of fee land within the exterior boundaries of the Yakima Indian Reservation (Reservation). 1 Specifically, the plaintiff…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- BRENDALE v. CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKIMA INDIAN NATION Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- LAC COURTE OREILLES BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR CHIPPEWA IND. v. State of Wis.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1987
- Yakima Indian Nation v. WhitesideDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1985
- Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation v. Jim Whiteside, and Philip Brendale, Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation v. County of YakimaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.