Legal Opinion

BRENDALE v. CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKIMA INDIAN NATION Et Al.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 29, 1989No. 87-1622PublishedCited by 198 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*414Justice White,

joined by The Chief Justice, Justice Sc alia, and Justice Kennedy, delivered an opinion announcing the judgment of the Court in Nos. 87-1697 and 87-1711 and dissenting in No. 87-1622.

The issue presented by these three consolidated cases is whether the Yakima Indian Nation or the County of Yakima, a governmental unit of the State of Washington, has the authority to zone fee lands owned by nonmembers of the Tribe located within the boundaries of the Yakima Reservation.

hH

ut>

The Confederated Bands and Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation are composed of 14 originally distinct Indian…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  4. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Oneida Indian Nation v. County of OneidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by198 opinions

  1. Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant/appellant v. Frank Rose Clive "Sonny" Miller, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. McGirt v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  3. Nevada v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Strate v. A-1 ContractorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. County of Yakima v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

193 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API