Legal Opinion
Yakima Indian Nation v. Whiteside
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided September 11, 1985No. C-83-724-JLQPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
QUACKENBUSH, District Judge.
The Yakima Indian Nation (Yakima Nation) brought this suit seeking a declaratory judgment and injunction barring the defendants from taking or permitting any land use within the so-called “Open Area” of the Yakima Indian Reservation (Reservation) which is contrary to the Amended Zoning Regulations of the Yakima Nation (Yakima Nation Code). The named defendants are the Yakima County Commissioners; the Director of Yakima County Planning Department; and Stanley Wilkinson, record owner of fee land within the “Open Area.” 1 Specifically, the plaintiff…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- BRENDALE v. CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKIMA INDIAN NATION Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Yakima Tribal CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Evans v. Shoshone-Bannock Land Use Policy CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Yakima Tribal Court of the Yakima Indian Nation and David Ward, Tribal JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation v. Jim Whiteside, and Philip Brendale, Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation v. County of YakimaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.