Legal Opinion

Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1986No. 7960PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIVINS, Judge.

We withdraw the opinion filed on December 12, 1985, and substitute the following.

From an order awarding petitioners Ramah (Ramah School Board, Inc., and Lembke Construction Company, Inc.) attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1988 following remand from the United States Supreme Court, respondent Bureau (Bureau of Revenue, State of New Mexico) appeals. The Bureau raises three issues:

1. Whether Ramah’s complaint sufficiently pled a 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 violation so as to allow an attorney’s fee award under Section 1988;

2. Whether the Bureau is a “person” within…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Fuchilla v. LaymanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  4. Hill v. Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  5. Hoopa Valley Tribe v. NevinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API